From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD/IOMMU: Process softirqs while building dom0 iommu mappings Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:17:08 +0000 Message-ID: <51484934.20600@citrix.com> References: <418b06908cc0ed501bd7.1363630403@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com> <51483F9402000078000C6A6E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51483F9402000078000C6A6E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" , Jacob Shin , SuraveeSuthikulpanit , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/03/13 09:36, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 18.03.13 at 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Recent changes which have made their way into xen-4.2 stable have pushed the >> runtime of construct_dom0() over 5 seconds, which has caused regressions in >> XenServer testing because of our 5 second watchdog. > The patch looks fine, but can you be a little more precise on which > "recent changes" this is about? > > Jan > Sadly not specifically - I did a semi-bisect looking at the suspicious changesets back to the last successful test but have not find an individual one which makes a significant difference. As our 4.2 testing is quite new, it is possible it was just a fluke pass before, meaning the range of "recent changes" might be anything in 4.2. ~Andrew