From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] handsfree-audio: Add support for initiating SCO connections
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:38:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51492F33.2080602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363738235-15211-2-git-send-email-vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3783 bytes --]
Hi Vinicius,
On 03/19/2013 07:10 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> When calling the card's .Connect() method, we should be able to
> establish a SCO connection.
>
> Right now, we only have support for establishing the SCO connection
> directly, this is what is expected from HFP 1.5 HF/AG devices.
> ---
> src/handsfree-audio.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/handsfree-audio.c b/src/handsfree-audio.c
> index c7fa2fb..9eecb8e 100644
> --- a/src/handsfree-audio.c
> +++ b/src/handsfree-audio.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct ofono_handsfree_card {
> char *remote;
> char *local;
> char *path;
> + DBusMessage *msg;
> + guint sco_watch;
> const struct ofono_handsfree_card_driver *driver;
> void *driver_data;
> };
> @@ -235,10 +237,100 @@ static DBusMessage *card_get_properties(DBusConnection *conn,
> return reply;
> }
>
> +static int card_connect_sco(struct ofono_handsfree_card *card)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_sco addr;
> + int sk, ret;
> +
> + sk = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_SEQPACKET | O_NONBLOCK | SOCK_CLOEXEC,
> + BTPROTO_SCO);
> + if (sk< 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* Bind to local address */
> + memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
> + addr.sco_family = AF_BLUETOOTH;
> + bt_str2ba(card->local,&addr.sco_bdaddr);
> +
> + if (bind(sk, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr))< 0) {
> + close(sk);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Connect to remote device */
> + memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
> + addr.sco_family = AF_BLUETOOTH;
> + bt_str2ba(card->remote,&addr.sco_bdaddr);
> +
> + ret = connect(sk, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> + if (ret< 0&& !(errno == EAGAIN || errno == EINPROGRESS)) {
Why do we use EAGAIN here? I thought only EINPROGRESS can be returned
from a non-blocking connect. Or are Bluetooth semantics different?
> + close(sk);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return sk;
> +}
> +
> +static gboolean sco_connect_cb(GIOChannel *io, GIOCondition cond,
> + gpointer user_data)
> +
> +{
> + struct ofono_handsfree_card *card = user_data;
> + DBusMessage *reply;
> + int sk;
> +
> + if (cond& (G_IO_ERR | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_NVAL)) {
> + reply = __ofono_error_failed(card->msg);
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + sk = g_io_channel_unix_get_fd(io);
> +
> + close(sk);
> +
> + reply = dbus_message_new_method_return(card->msg);
> +
We probably should be paranoid and check whether we still have the agent.
> +done:
> + g_dbus_send_message(ofono_dbus_get_connection(), reply);
> +
> + return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> +static void sco_watch_destroy(gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + struct ofono_handsfree_card *card = user_data;
> +
> + card->sco_watch = 0;
> + dbus_message_unref(card->msg);
> +}
> +
> static DBusMessage *card_connect(DBusConnection *conn,
> DBusMessage *msg, void *data)
> {
> - return __ofono_error_not_implemented(msg);
> + struct ofono_handsfree_card *card = data;
> + GIOChannel *io;
> + int sk;
> +
> + if (agent == NULL)
> + return __ofono_error_not_available(msg);
> +
> + if (card->msg)
> + return __ofono_error_busy(msg);
> +
> + sk = card_connect_sco(card);
I presume this fails if we already have a SCO link?
> + if (sk< 0)
> + return __ofono_error_failed(msg);
> +
> + io = g_io_channel_unix_new(sk);
> + card->sco_watch = g_io_add_watch_full(io, G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
> + G_IO_OUT | G_IO_ERR | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_NVAL,
> + sco_connect_cb, card, sco_watch_destroy);
> +
> + g_io_channel_unref(io);
> +
> + card->msg = dbus_message_ref(msg);
> +
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static const GDBusMethodTable card_methods[] = {
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 0:10 [PATCH 1/3] ofono.conf: Punch hole for HandsfreeAudioAgent Vinicius Costa Gomes
2013-03-20 0:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] handsfree-audio: Add support for initiating SCO connections Vinicius Costa Gomes
2013-03-20 3:38 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2013-03-20 15:15 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2013-03-20 21:04 ` Denis Kenzior
2013-03-20 0:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] handsfree-audio: Add support for sending the SCO socket Vinicius Costa Gomes
2013-03-20 3:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] ofono.conf: Punch hole for HandsfreeAudioAgent Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51492F33.2080602@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.