From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mst@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:19:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514954F0.2040604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363697906.21184.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 03/19/2013 08:58 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 05:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>> I believe before doing header check for untrusted packets, the only
>>> thing we can trust is skb->len and that's we've used before
>>> 1def9238d4aa2. But after that, we're trying to use unchecked or
>>> meaningless value (e.g gso_segs were reset to zero in
>>> tun/macvtap/packet), and guest then can utilize this to result a very
>>> huge (-1U) pkt_len by filling evil value in the header. Can all kinds of
>>> packet scheduler survive this kinds of possible DOS?
>> I would use the flow dissector to fix the transport header from all
>> DODGY providers.
>>
>> Daniel Borkmann is working on a patch serie adding nhoff into flow_keys,
>> and adding __skb_get_poff(const struct sk_buff *skb), for a BPF
>> extension we talked about in Copenhagen / Netfilter Workshop.
>>
>> You could then set the transport header offset to the right value.
>>
>> (and drop evil packets before they go further in the stack)
>>
>> if (gso_packet(skb)) {
>> u32 poff = __skb_get_poff(skb);
>>
>> if (!poff) {
>> drop_evil_packet(skb);
>> } else {
>> skb_set_transport_header(skb, poff);
>> ...
>> }
>> }
>
> Oh well, no need to use __skb_get_poff() but plain skb_flow_dissect()
> (once patched to include thoff in struct flow_keys)
>
> struct flow_keys keys;
>
> if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
> goto drop;
>
> if ((gso_type & (SKB_GSO_TCPV4|SKB_GSO_TCPV6)) &&
> keys.ip_proto != IP_PROTO_TCP)
> goto drop;
>
> skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
I was consider a just skb_reset_transport_header() here. Consider the
transport header maybe checked and reset during header check for packets
of gso or partial checksum. And bypass precise pkt len computation.
Some problems with skb_flow_dissect():
- it can only recognizes a subset of all ethernet protocols. The may
blocks guest who may want to use other protocol such as IPX.
- almost no check in the validity of the L4 protocol header which may be
used by qdisc_pkt_len_init(), which may still give a chance to evil
guest to use
- gso_segs were untouched (still zero)
Another method is doing header check here which needs more work.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 7:41 [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-15 7:41 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: reset transport header if it was not set before transmission Jason Wang
2013-03-16 2:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-17 16:13 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 9:26 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-19 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 12:58 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-03-19 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 13:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-03-17 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets David Miller
2013-03-19 9:25 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-19 12:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 12:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-20 6:19 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-03-20 13:46 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514954F0.2040604@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.