From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:58:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5149883A.1060806@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1363664213.git.zliu@redhat.com>
On 03/19/2013 11:40 AM, Zhouping Liu wrote:
> changed log from v1 to v2:
> 1. added a new is_numa() function instead of ISNUMA global variable;
> 2. added new patch to remove the prefix underscroe '_' of the
> internal function name;
> 3. used SAFE_FILE_SCANF() instead of read_file().
> 4. some cleanup...
>
> changed log from v2 to v3:
> 1. as Jan's suggestion, pass 'nodes=NULL' to get_allowed_nodes_arr()
> in is_numa(), and free 'nodes' variable when it passed a non-NULL
> value inside testoom().
>
> changed log from v3 to v4:
> 1. fixed some patch style error
Sorry, I mean ACK V4.
Acked-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> The patch set updated all OOM testcases, and added a new testcase.
>
> Inside old version, OOM only test MPOL_MBIND mempolicy in NUMA
> system, and the combination of CPUSET, MEMCG & NUMA is complex,
> and not clear. Also CPUSET is only used in NUMA system.
>
> These patch set adjust them, now we can coverage the below tests:
> 1) OOM under normal - oom01
> 2) OOM under all mempolicy - oom02
> 3) OOM under MEMCG (+ mempolicy) - oom03
> 4) OOM under CPUSET (+ mempolicy) - oom04
> 5) OOM under CPUSET & MEMCG - oom05
>
> Zhouping Liu (7):
> lib/mem: modified _gather_cpus() as _gather_node_cpus()
> mm/oom02: modified 'OOM for NUMA' as 'OOM for mempolicy'
> numa_helper: added a new function is_numa()
> mm/oom0[3|4]: added 'OOM for CPUSET' and moved 'OOM with MEMCG &
> numa' to oom03
> lib/mem: updated testoom() and oom() funcs
> mm/oom05: new testcase
> lib/mem: removed the prefix underscore '_' of the internal function
> name
>
> runtest/mm | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/include/numa_helper.h | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/lib/numa_helper.c | 24 ++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h | 4 +-
> testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c | 6 +-
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c | 20 +++--
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c | 23 +++++-
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c | 60 ++++++--------
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 3:40 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/7] lib/mem: modified _gather_cpus() as _gather_node_cpus() Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/oom02: modified 'OOM for NUMA' as 'OOM for mempolicy' Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 3/7] numa_helper: added a new function is_numa() Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/oom0[3|4]: added 'OOM for CPUSET' and moved 'OOM with MEMCG & numa' to oom03 Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 5/7] lib/mem: updated testoom() and oom() funcs Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 6/7] mm/oom05: new testcase Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 7/7] lib/mem: removed the prefix underscore '_' of the internal function name Zhouping Liu
2013-03-20 9:58 ` Wanlong Gao [this message]
2013-03-20 10:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM Caspar Zhang
2013-03-21 0:52 ` Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5149883A.1060806@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zliu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.