From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIJy3-0003gD-Ns for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:26:20 +0100 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1D6D2D22E8; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:09:28 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19744D20D2 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:09:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5149C2FF.4070309@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:09:03 +0100 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1363772243-370-1-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <1586733.G7AaCq5rbs@helios> <51499277.8000400@linaro.org> <5149B097.40106@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <5149B097.40106@windriver.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Subject: Re: [RFC] Switching from glibc RPC to TI RPC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:26:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 20.03.2013 13:50, Mark Hatle pisze: > On 3/20/13 5:41 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Good point. YP-tools are not buildable with my changeset due to lack of >> YP support in libtirpc. > There is definitely a class of user (networking devices) where nis/yp > are still being used. I would love to see NIS support be a distro > feature or similar configure time element. Good idea. > -after- the upcoming release, I think we should pursue these patches, > assuming we can get the NIS support enabled in some way. Looks like we have to wait for TI RPC to mature more. > BTW my only other question was the busybox side. I'm a bit confused by > the comment. I thought the mount_nfs was still required because it > enabled the proper binding argument for the mount syscall. While I > don't believe we need to still support the older kernel(s), we > definitely need NFS mounts to work in busybox. Since http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=a86e02492d7700ce8cb4108f53646dfb025c2dff change (2011-11-10) this option is not needed to mount NFS with 2.6.23+ kernel: config FEATURE_MOUNT_NFS bool "Support mounting NFS file systems on Linux < 2.6.23" default n depends on MOUNT select FEATURE_HAVE_RPC select FEATURE_SYSLOG help Enable mounting of NFS file systems on Linux kernels prior to version 2.6.23. Note that in this case mounting of NFS over IPv6 will not be possible. Note that this option links in RPC support from libc, which is rather large (~10 kbytes on uclibc).