From: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>
To: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Cc: "Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)" <gcs@debian.hu>,
Dan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, james.page@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: deb/rpm package purge
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:48:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5149CC4A.9030409@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1303200545140.11428@cobra.newdream.net>
On 03/20/2013 07:48 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>>> On the other hand, 'dpkg --purge' is to remove everything the package
>>>> has installed and/or generated. This includes debconf answers as well.
>>>> With other words, purge is used to make the system totally clean of the
>>>> package. As such, if the sysadmin install the package again, all debconf
>>>> questions will be asked again and all generated files will be generated
>>>> again from scratch.
>>>
>>> I understand that part, but the policy isn't very clear about files that
>>> are not part of the package but are generated as a result of the package
>>> being installed (i.e., user data).
>> Forgive me, I just learnt English and my wording may not be that clear
>> for a natural speaker.
>>
>>> As a point of comparison, mysql removes the config files but not
>>> /var/lib/mysql.
>> As I remember, MySQL asks if /var/lib/mysql/ should be purged or not; I
>> may mix with an other (database related) package.
>>
>>> The question is, is that okay/typical/desireable/recommended/a bad idea?
>> I can rephrase my words. Purge removes the (binary) package files, its
>> configuration and logs (its generated files). To emphasis, user files
>> are _not_ fall into this category and must remain as-is, _intact_.
>> Some packages writes a console message that 'your files remain at xxx,
>> they were not removed' on purge. Others just leave the dpkg warning
>> "directory not empty so not removed" which means user files may have
>> left there and that may be the reason the directory is not empty.
>> I'm in a rush, but hopefully will be able to note policy parts in the
>> afternoon (CET).
>
> Thanks, Laszlo, that's exactly what I was after! Sorry for the confusing
> exchange. :)
>
> Sounds like in this case, the fix is simply to leave /var/lib/ceph
> untouched.
>
> We'll need to update teuthology ceph.py and nuke to clean up /var/lib/ceph
> (for qa runs), and I think we should add a ceph-deploy 'purgedata' command
> to clean out /var/lib/ceph on a given host.
It's not as important given that it won't outright destroy the cluster,
but perhaps we should also leave /etc/ceph untouched on purge if a
ceph.conf file has been placed in it (since that also was not installed
by the package, but rather by a user?). I figure we should probably try
to get it right now. The message about the directory not being empty
sounds good.
My thought here is:
- remove anything created by the packages in /var/lib/ceph that has been
untouched since package installation.
- remove /var/lib/ceph if it has been untouched
- remove /etc/ceph if it has been untouched
Thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 19:48 deb/rpm package purge Sage Weil
2013-03-19 19:59 ` Greg Farnum
2013-03-19 20:05 ` Mark Nelson
2013-03-19 20:46 ` Dan Mick
2013-03-19 20:51 ` Sage Weil
2013-03-19 22:27 ` Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
2013-03-19 22:29 ` Sage Weil
2013-03-19 22:51 ` Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
2013-03-19 22:59 ` Sage Weil
2013-03-20 6:29 ` Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
2013-03-20 12:48 ` Sage Weil
2013-03-20 14:48 ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2013-03-20 17:27 ` James Page
2013-03-20 23:23 ` Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
2013-03-21 1:08 ` Dan Mick
2013-03-19 23:01 ` Mark Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5149CC4A.9030409@inktank.com \
--to=mark.nelson@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.mick@inktank.com \
--cc=gcs@debian.hu \
--cc=james.page@ubuntu.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.