From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson@jamponi.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:11:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B232E.2050705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKuK5J05iXaDd7Q4fLby9vJyPXBURx06xb0_--WmgTpJ0j2RoA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/21/13 10:04 AM, Jon Nelson wrote:
> I'm running openSUSE 12.3 x86_64 which has an unknown git version, but
> reports v0.19.
> I'm also supplying the output from git which reports itself as:
> v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
> The problem is that btrfs-show (git) and btrfs fi show (git) give
> /different/ output from each other which is also different from the
> (older) btrfs.
>
> First btrfs-show (git):
>
> **
> ** WARNING: this program is considered deprecated
> ** Please consider to switch to the btrfs utility
> **
> Label: none uuid: b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 230.34GB
> devid 1 size 298.09GB used 298.09GB path /dev/sda
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
>
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
>
> Now btrfs fi show (git):
>
> failed to open /dev/sr0: No medium found
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
>
> Label: none uuid: b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 230.34GB
> devid 1 size 298.09GB used 298.09GB path /dev/sdb
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
>
> And now the (older) btrfs fi show:
>
> failed to read /dev/sr0
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
>
> Btrfs v0.19+
>
> which has similar output to the (older) btrfs-show.
>
>
> The differences are:
>
> 1. the order of devices varies (not a big deal)
Heh, that is annoying though.
> 2. the current git btrfs-show and btrfs fi show both output
> *different* devices for device with UUID
> b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240, and they're both wrong.
does blkid output find that uuid anywhere?
Since you're working in git, can you maybe do a little bisecting
to find out when it changed? Should be a fairly quick test?
-Eric
> Somewhat confusingly, /dev/disk/by-uuid/ only shows three devices:
>
> bd40cb4e-93bb-4600-8455-ca1185aa8abe -> ../../md3
> 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace -> ../../sda3
> 4f0b27a5-5f5b-413c-a71b-b5a3bec5482c -> ../../md2
>
> What's going on with the varied output from (git) btrfs-show vs.
> 'btrfs fi show' (vs. the older, as-shipped btrfs)?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 15:04 btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:11 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-21 15:29 ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:33 ` Helmut Hullen
2013-03-21 16:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-22 3:06 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-22 13:59 ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-22 22:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-21 15:35 ` Helmut Hullen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514B232E.2050705@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jnelson@jamponi.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.