From: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
To: "Aurélien Jarno" <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG broken in system mode (was TCG assertion with qemu-system-mipsel)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:48:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514BB866.20809@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321221153.GA11625@ohm.aurel32.net>
On 03/22/2013 07:11 AM, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:04:44PM +0900, Yeongkyoon Lee wrote:
>> On 03/18/2013 07:27 AM, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:10:17AM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:05:15AM +0900, Yeongkyoon Lee wrote:
>>>>> On 03/05/2013 11:18 PM, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:37:31PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>>>>>> This assertion occured with latest git master:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> qemu-system-mipsel: /src/qemu/tcg/tcg-op.h:2589:
>>>>>>>> tcg_gen_goto_tb: Assertion `(tcg_ctx.goto_tb_issue_mask & (1 << idx))
>>>>>>>> == 0' failed.
>>>>>>>> Aborted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> QEMU was built with --enable-debug and running a Debian MIPS Lenny (NFS
>>>>>>>> root).
>>>>>>>> The assertion happened when running "apt-get update" in the guest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it something reproductible or more or less random? Have you Cc:ed
>>>>>>> Richard because it's related to the latest patches?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On my side I am experiencing random segfaults in various guests (at
>>>>>>> least PowerPC, MIPS, SH4 and ARM). I have found a way to bisect it, even
>>>>>>> if it is quite long (building Perl + the testsuite). Currently I know
>>>>>>> that 1.3 is affected, while 1.2 is not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have found that the issue comes from the following commits, which
>>>>>> unfortunately are not bisectable one by one (though it won't change the
>>>>>> results a lot):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit b76f0d8c2e3eac94bc7fd90a510cb7426b2a2699
>>>>>> Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Date: Wed Oct 31 16:04:25 2012 +0900
>>>>>> tcg: Optimize qemu_ld/st by generating slow paths at the end of a block
>>>>>> Add optimized TCG qemu_ld/st generation which locates the code of TLB miss
>>>>>> cases at the end of a block after generating the other IRs.
>>>>>> Currently, this optimization supports only i386 and x86_64 hosts.
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
>>>>>> commit fdbb84d1332ae0827d60f1a2ca03c7d5678c6edd
>>>>>> Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Date: Wed Oct 31 16:04:24 2012 +0900
>>>>>> tcg: Add extended GETPC mechanism for MMU helpers with ldst optimization
>>>>>> Add GETPC_EXT which is used by MMU helpers to selectively calculate the code
>>>>>> address of accessing guest memory when called from a qemu_ld/st optimized code
>>>>>> or a C function. Currently, it supports only i386 and x86-64 hosts.
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
>>>>>> commit 32761257c0b9fa7ee04d2871a6e48a41f119c469
>>>>>> Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Date: Wed Oct 31 16:04:23 2012 +0900
>>>>>> configure: Add CONFIG_QEMU_LDST_OPTIMIZATION for TCG qemu_ld/st optimization
>>>>>> Enable CONFIG_QEMU_LDST_OPTIMIZATION for TCG qemu_ld/st optimization only when
>>>>>> a host is i386 or x86_64.
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will try to understand why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Aurélien,
>>>>> Do you mean that those random segfaults occurred only when
>>>>> configured with "--enable-debug"?
>>>>> Although I cannot see how my commits affect debug built image at a
>>>>> glance, I'll do double-check.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>> The problem is there even without configuring QEMU with --enable-debug.
>>>> It justs doesn't happens very often, and very randomly. The only way to
>>>> reproduce it each time is to launch a big task in the guest (for me
>>>> building Perl) and see if it completes or now. It can take up to one
>>>> hour until it happens.
>>>>
>>>> I should precise that the segfault is on the guest side.
>>>>
>>>> I have tried to look at your patches, and so far I haven't found the
>>>> issue. It seems the two first patches are fine, ie I have verified the
>>>> return address is always correctly computed.
>>>>
>>> I still haven't found the issue, but on the other hand I can't find any
>>> problem in your code, after reading it dozen of times. I also tried to
>>> modify it as less as possible while issuing the slow path back inside
>>> the TB and it fixes the problem. So it really looks like to be due to
>>> the slow path being at the end of the TB, and not to a bug in the code
>>> generating it. After adding various checks, I am also convinced the
>>> address computed in GETPC_EXT() is always correct. I have to say I am
>>> running out of ideas.
>>>
>>> One way to reproduce the issue more easily is to reduce the size of the
>>> generated code buffer, for example by setting it to 512kB for both
>>> MIN_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE and MAX_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE in
>>> translate-all.c. That way booting an ARM guest triggers plenty of
>>> segmentation faults or other strange issues with your patch but not
>>> without.
>>>
>>> OTOH increasing this size make the issue to almost disappear even when
>>> building perl including the testsuite (for that it has to be at least
>>> 512MB).
>>>
>> Although I've not succeeded to reproduce the problem, I've found a
>> suspicious code stub about boundary-checking of generated code
>> (is_tcg_gen_code() in translate-all.c).
>>
>> The code is supposed to be changed as follows.case
>> Before:
>> return (tc_ptr >= (uintptr_t)tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer &&
>> tc_ptr < (uintptr_t)(tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer +
>> tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer_max_size));
>> After:
>> return (tc_ptr >= (uintptr_t)tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer &&
>> tc_ptr < (uintptr_t)(tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer +
>> tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer_size));
>>
>> The reason is that there could happen to miss out the generated code
>> ranges by "(TCG_MAX_OP_SIZE * OPC_BUF_SIZE)".
>> See code_gen_alloc() in translate-all.c:
>> tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer_max_size = tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer_size
>> - (TCG_MAX_OP_SIZE * OPC_BUF_SIZE)
>>
> Very good catch! Thanks. This fixes the issue I observed.
>
> To give more details, code_gen_buffer_max_size corresponds to the
> threshold which clear all TBs before continuing generating code. This
> means that it can be exceeded by a few bytes and up to (TCG_MAX_OP_SIZE
> * OPC_BUF_SIZE) bytes which corresponds to the maximum bytes of a
> generated TB.
>
> Could you please send a proper patch to fix that? I think it should also
> be fixed in the next 0.13.x and 0.14.x releases (0.12.x releases are not
> affected), so please Cc: qemu-stable (even if the patch will have to be
> slightly tweaked).
>
Sure, I'll send the patch.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51293E4A.1040100@weilnetz.de>
2013-03-04 16:37 ` [Qemu-devel] TCG assertion with qemu-system-mipsel Aurélien Jarno
2013-03-04 20:29 ` Stefan Weil
2013-03-05 14:18 ` Aurélien Jarno
2013-03-06 2:05 ` Yeongkyoon Lee
2013-03-06 6:10 ` Aurélien Jarno
2013-03-17 22:27 ` [Qemu-devel] TCG broken in system mode (was TCG assertion with qemu-system-mipsel) Aurélien Jarno
2013-03-21 7:04 ` Yeongkyoon Lee
2013-03-21 22:11 ` Aurélien Jarno
2013-03-22 1:48 ` Yeongkyoon Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514BB866.20809@samsung.com \
--to=yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.