From: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: speedup in __early_pfn_to_nid
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:11:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514FB24F.8080104@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUjVRUs02-ymmtO+5+SgqTWK8Ae6jJwD08uRbgR=eLJgw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/24/2013 04:37 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> +int __init_memblock memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long *start_pfn, unsigned long *end_pfn)
> +{
> + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
> + int mid = memblock_search(type, (phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
I'm really eager to see how much time can we save using binary search compared to
linear search in this case :)
(quote)
> A 4 TB (single rack) UV1 system takes 512 seconds to get through
> the zone code. This performance optimization reduces the time
> by 189 seconds, a 36% improvement.
>
> A 2 TB (single rack) UV2 system goes from 212.7 seconds to 99.8 seconds,
> a 112.9 second (53%) reduction.
(quote)
thanks,
linfeng
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: speedup in __early_pfn_to_nid
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:11:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514FB24F.8080104@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUjVRUs02-ymmtO+5+SgqTWK8Ae6jJwD08uRbgR=eLJgw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/24/2013 04:37 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> +int __init_memblock memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long *start_pfn, unsigned long *end_pfn)
> +{
> + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
> + int mid = memblock_search(type, (phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
I'm really eager to see how much time can we save using binary search compared to
linear search in this case :)
(quote)
> A 4 TB (single rack) UV1 system takes 512 seconds to get through
> the zone code. This performance optimization reduces the time
> by 189 seconds, a 36% improvement.
>
> A 2 TB (single rack) UV2 system goes from 212.7 seconds to 99.8 seconds,
> a 112.9 second (53%) reduction.
(quote)
thanks,
linfeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 15:56 [patch] mm: speedup in __early_pfn_to_nid Russ Anderson
2013-03-18 15:56 ` Russ Anderson
2013-03-19 3:56 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-19 3:56 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-20 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-20 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-20 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-21 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-21 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-21 12:35 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 12:35 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-21 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-25 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-25 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-26 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-26 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-21 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-21 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-22 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-22 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-23 15:29 ` Russ Anderson
2013-03-23 15:29 ` Russ Anderson
2013-03-23 20:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-25 2:11 ` Lin Feng [this message]
2013-03-25 2:11 ` Lin Feng
2013-03-25 21:56 ` Russ Anderson
2013-03-25 21:56 ` Russ Anderson
2013-03-25 22:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-23 22:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-03-23 22:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-03-25 0:28 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-25 0:28 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-25 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-25 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-25 22:36 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-25 22:36 ` David Rientjes
2013-03-25 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-25 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-24 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-24 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514FB24F.8080104@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.