From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: daniel.leung@linux.intel.com
Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: do not process feature reports in raw_event
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:45:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51507136.4020308@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363886546-6517-1-git-send-email-daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>
Daniel,
I am looking at 3.9.rc1.
The only place I see the raw_event callback is called from
hid/hid_input_report(). hid_input_report is called with type
HID_INPUT_REPORT in all cases, except hid_ctrl(), where it can be
different depending on xx.report->type. But here, the return value is
not checked.
Do you know the call chain for HID_FETURE_REPORT, where this is creating
problem?
Thanks,
Srinivas
On 03/21/2013 10:22 AM, daniel.leung@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>
>
> In sensor_hub_raw_event(), HID feature reports are ignored but are
> still marked as processed. This causes the in-kernel struct not to be
> updated. Any non-updated fields in the feature reports are zero, and
> they are being sent to the device. This causes confusion in the
> sensor hub firmware, and some sensors are not powered up as a result.
>
> This changes the raw_event rountine to only process input reports,
> and let the hid core handle the incoming feature reports.
>
> The issue has been observed on Acer Iconia W700.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> index ca749810..3f7df68 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
> report->id, size, report->type);
> hid_dbg(hdev, "maxfield:%d\n", report->maxfield);
> if (report->type != HID_INPUT_REPORT)
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
>
> ptr = raw_data;
> ptr++; /*Skip report id*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 17:22 [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: do not process feature reports in raw_event daniel.leung
2013-03-25 15:45 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2013-03-27 15:09 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-04-04 7:48 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-04-08 16:54 ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-08 16:54 ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-09 23:55 ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-09 23:55 ` Daniel Leung
2013-04-10 15:44 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-01 17:13 ` Daniel Leung
2013-05-29 14:19 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51507136.4020308@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.leung@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.