From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UKOJa-0004gj-F4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:29:36 +0100 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8B26ED22E8; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:12:09 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B26D0D22B2 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:11:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51514A23.3080109@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:11:31 +0100 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1364203235-2737-1-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <01AB5E40-2C26-4250-BB86-20A74683FBC4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <01AB5E40-2C26-4250-BB86-20A74683FBC4@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tbb: add 4.1 20130116 version (4.1 update 2) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:29:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 26.03.2013 06:59, Khem Raj pisze: > On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:20 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz >> +do_compile() { + oe_runmake compiler=gcc arch=${HOST_ARCH} >> runtime=cc4.7_libc2.17_kernel3.8 tbb tbbmalloc +} > hmmm do you have to encode the tools versions like that, say in > future we move to gcc 4.8 or kernel 3.9 will this need adjusting too? If runtime is not defined it is created based on host system so can be totally wrong. From quick look at makefiles there is only compiler part checked for "cc3" or "cc4" - to add some arguments to flags. New version sent.