[PATCH v2 10/10] arm: zynq: Add cpuidle support

[daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)]

On 03/27/2013 10:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
>> 2013/3/26 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>>> On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-zynq/Makefile  |    1 +
>>>>  arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpuidle.c |  133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpuidle.c
>>>
>>> Can you move that file to drivers/cpuidle instead?
>>
>> I can't see any problem in it right now.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Adding Daniel Lezcano to CC, he's currently doing a lot of work on
> the cpuidle drivers and may have some input as well.

Thanks Arnd,

I commented the driver.

I am in favor for moving also this driver to drivers/cpuidle.

I suggest in the future, you nack any new drivers which is not located
in drivers/cpuidle. Let's try to move the current ones out of
arch/arm/mach-* and concentrate the location in a single place.

Maintaining all these drivers by jumping branch to branch like a monkey
is really painful :)

>>>> +/* Initialize CPU idle by registering the idle states */
>>>> +static int xilinx_init_cpuidle(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       unsigned int cpu;
>>>> +       struct cpuidle_device *device;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = cpuidle_register_driver(&xilinx_idle_driver);
>>>> +       if (ret) {
>>>> +               pr_err("Registering Xilinx CpuIdle Driver failed.\n");
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +       }
>>>
>>> I think you have to check that you actually run on a Zynq system before
>>> registering the driver.
>>
>> Is there any elegant way how to do it?
>> I see that Rob is checking compatible machine with of_machine_is_compatible().
>>
> 
> Most drivers use some resource that they can check the presence of, which is
> better than checking the global "compatible" property of the system. I don't
> see any of that in your driver, but I may be missing something. What is it
> specifically that makes this cpuidle driver special to Zynq and different
> from other cpuidle drivers? Is that difference something we can describe
> using the device tree in more specific terms than the root compatible
> property?
> 
> 	Arnd
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog