From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Xen HVM regression on certain Intel CPUs Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:30:09 -0700 Message-ID: <51532CA1.6030809@zytor.com> References: <51530F9F.10805@canonical.com> <515315EC.4030803@canonical.com> <20130327160427.GB6688@phenom.dumpdata.com> <5153222B.3030605@canonical.com> <51532C43.8010808@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51532C43.8010808@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefan Bader Cc: wei.y.yang@intel.com, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , haitao.shan@intel.com, xin.li@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/27/2013 10:28 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: > > I will need more time to look into this (and unlikely today) but it > feels like at least the cpuid flags passed on to HVM guest may be > not influenced by the smep boot argument. Probably rather something > I could do by masking in the config of the guest (which could be > another pain as I normally configure those via libvirt). > There is an "nosmep" kernel command line option. -hpa