From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <515361D4.4040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:17:08 -0400 From: Corey Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51534E5C.8070303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130327201251.GA6480@openwall.com> In-Reply-To: <20130327201251.GA6480@openwall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Security vulnerability tools To: Solar Designer Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, oss-security@lists.openwall.com List-ID: On 03/27/2013 04:12 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > Hi, > > Guys, can we continue this thread on oss-security only, please? It is a > topic for oss-security, but less so for kernel-hardening. Anyone on > kernel-hardening who is interested in this topic should join oss-security. > > Just drop kernel-hardening from further replies. > Sure, sorry about that. I am interested in tools that are applicable to the kernel too though, if that changes anything. > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote: >> I'll plan on updating http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/tools with >> anything it doesn't already have. > > Yes, please! > >> Clang >> ----- >> Static analysis tool for C/C++ > > Clang and very recent GCC also have dynamic "sanitizers": > > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/MemorySanitizer.html Great, thanks! > > Thanks, > > Alexander > > -- Regards, Corey Bryant