Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux: printk is needed in filter.h when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined

[Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>]

On 2013年03月30日 11:32, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:10:55 +0800
> 
>> > On 2013^[$BG/^[(B03^[$B7n^[(B30^[$BF|^[(B 03:34, David Miller wrote:
>>> >> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>>> >> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:24:53 +0800
>>> >> 
>>>>> >>> > 
>>>>> >>> >   for make V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm allmodconfig
>>>>> >>> >     printk is need when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined
>>>>> >>> >     or it will report pr_err and print_hex_dump are implicit declaration
>>>>> >>> > 
>>>>> >>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>>> >> There are no references to pr_err nor print_hex_dump in this
>>> >> filter.h header file.
>> > 
>> >   maybe we see the different tree.
>> >   I find it in next-20130328.
> When you submit patches, always mention explicitly what tree you
> want the patch applied to.
> 
> In this case, this appropriate tree to be "net-next" since that
> is the tree where the problem actually exists.

  I should notice, next time.

> 
> Patch applied, thanks.
> 
> 

  thanks, too.


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation