All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
	pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, jkosina@suse.cz,
	clark.williams@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:13:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515AA13A.5090709@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364891674.4976.65.camel@marge.simpson.net>

On 04/02/2013 04:34 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
[snip]
>> The reason may caused by wake_affine()'s higher overhead, and pgbench is
>> really sensitive to this stuff...
> 
> For grins, you could try running the whole thing SCHED_BATCH.  (/me sees
> singing/dancing red herring whenever wake_affine() and pgbench appear in
> the same sentence;)

I saw the patch touched the wake_affine(), just interested on what will
happen ;-)

The patch changed the overhead of wake_affine(), and also influence it's
result, I used to think the later one may do some help to the pgbench...

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> -Mike
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-02  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-02  3:23 [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 1/8] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 2/8] sched: set initial value of runnable avg for new forked task Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 3/8] sched: only count runnable avg on cfs_rq's nr_running Alex Shi
2013-04-03  3:19   ` Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 4/8] sched: update cpu load after task_tick Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 5/8] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 6/8] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2013-04-09  7:08   ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09  8:05     ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09  8:58       ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 10:38         ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09 11:56           ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 14:48             ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09 15:16               ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-10  2:31                 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10  6:07     ` Michael Wang
2013-04-10  6:55       ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 7/8] sched: consider runnable load average in effective_load Alex Shi
2013-04-02  3:23 ` [patch v3 8/8] sched: use instant load for burst wake up Alex Shi
2013-04-02  7:23 ` [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance Michael Wang
2013-04-02  8:34   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-02  9:13     ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-04-02  8:35   ` Alex Shi
2013-04-02  9:45     ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  2:46     ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  2:56       ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  3:23         ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  4:28           ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  5:38             ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  5:53               ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  6:01               ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  6:22             ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  6:53               ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  7:18                 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03  7:28                   ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  8:46   ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03  9:37     ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 11:17       ` Alex Shi
2013-04-07  3:09     ` Michael Wang
2013-04-07  7:30       ` Alex Shi
2013-04-07  8:56         ` Michael Wang
2013-04-09  5:08 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10 13:12   ` Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515AA13A.5090709@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.