From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Avoid reverse resolution for server name
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:25:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515B22B3.8030406@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364926918.2660.1273.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
On 02/04/13 14:21, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 17:58 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-
>>> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Simo Sorce
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:49 PM
>>> To: Linux NFS Mailing list
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Avoid reverse resolution for server name
>>>
>>> A NFS client should be able to work properly even if the DNS Reverse record
>>> for the server is not set. There is no excuse to forcefully prevent that from
>>> working when it can.
>>
>> Note that rpc.statd has the same limitation.
>
> I checked rpc.statd with a quick "git grep getnameinfo", and as far as I
> can see PTR lookups are done only if the 'name' is actually an IP
> address, but skipped if not. So I think rpc.statd is ok.
>
> I see rpc.statd uses getaddrinfo with hints set to AI_NUMERICHOST, if
> that's preferred over using inet_pton I can change my patches to do the
> same.
Please do.. let try to keep it consistent.... thanks!
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 17:49 [PATCH 0/3] Avoid DNS Reverse lookups when possible Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] Fix segfault when using -R option Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 19:11 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-02 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Avoid reverse resolution for server name Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 17:58 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-02 18:08 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 18:53 ` Jeff Layton
2013-04-02 18:21 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 18:25 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2013-04-02 18:44 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 19:20 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-02 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] Alternative patchset to avoid PTR lookups Simo Sorce
2013-04-02 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] Avoid reverse resolution for server name Simo Sorce
2013-04-08 13:39 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-08 14:08 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-09 17:15 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-09 17:25 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-09 17:35 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-09 18:02 ` Simo Sorce
2013-04-09 18:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-09 19:12 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-09 19:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-10 10:43 ` Jeff Layton
2013-04-10 14:53 ` Steve Dickson
2013-04-02 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] Document new -z/-Z options Simo Sorce
2013-04-03 14:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-03 14:35 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-03 14:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-03 15:10 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-03 15:27 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-02 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] Document new -N option Simo Sorce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515B22B3.8030406@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.