From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 development update Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:37:22 +0200 Message-ID: <515BEA42.7030005@amazon.de> References: <515B186F02000078000CA1A7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20130402163440.GB17022@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <515B101A.7050501@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <515B101A.7050501@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02.04.13 19:06, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > On 4/2/2013 11:34 AM, Tim Deegan wrote: >> At 16:42 +0100 on 02 Apr (1364920927), Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 02.04.13 at 16:07, George Dunlap >>>>>> wrote: >>>> * AMD NPT performance regression after c/s 24770:7f79475d3de7 >>>> owner: ? >>>> Reference: http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=135075376805215 >>> This is supposedly fixed with the RTC changes Tim committed the >>> other day. Suravee, is that correct? >> This is a separate problem. IIRC the AMD XP perf issue is caused by the >> emulation of LAPIC TPR accesses slowing down with Andres's p2m locking >> patches. XP doesn't have 'lazy IRQL' or support for CR8, so it takes a >> _lot_ of vmexits for IRQL reads and writes. > Is there any tools or good ways to count the number of VMexit in Xen? xentrace -e 0x8f000 > xentrace.out [Hit ^C to abort] xentrace_format formats < xentrace.out > xentrace.dump You need to manually install 'formats' from tools/xentrace/formats to a proper place. Christoph