From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ARM: OMAP5: hwmod, clock and prm data files Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:06:24 +0530 Message-ID: <515D57A8.1090707@ti.com> References: <1358522856-12180-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:56415 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759562Ab3DDKe2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:34:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mturquette@linaro.org, tony@atomide.com, rnayak@ti.com, b-cousson@ti.com On Thursday 04 April 2013 01:43 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> Series contains the hwmod, clock and prm data files for OMAP54xx SOCs. >> This data was kept out of tree to be validated on es2.0 silicon version >> and also to avoid the es1.0/es2.0 differences which are many. >> >> Benoit Cousson, Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmesly and Mike have all contributed >> to get the autogen scripts in shape for OMAP5. >> >> >From various discussion on the list, the clock data files are suppose >> to be moved to drivers/clk/. Once the direction is clear, patch 8 >> can be updated accordingly. >> >> Patches are tested on OMAP5 sEVM and uEVM. For testing few additional patches >> are needed. Same tree can be fetched from here [1] >> >> The following changes since commit 7d1f9aeff1ee4a20b1aeb377dd0f579fe9647619: >> >> Linux 3.8-rc4 (2013-01-17 19:25:45 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/SantoshShilimkar/linux.git for_3.9/omap5_data_files >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 7f534e1ebeb2bc64250b56fe00eb7d4dfa585e8e: >> >> ARM: OMAP5: Enable build and frameowrk initialisations (2013-01-18 19:45:48 +0530) > > I've posted several comments on the patch contents themselves, all of > which are relatively minor, and should be easy to fix: > Indeed the fixes were easy. Have posted v2 [1] with the updates. Regards, Santosh [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg235575.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:06:24 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] ARM: OMAP5: hwmod, clock and prm data files In-Reply-To: References: <1358522856-12180-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Message-ID: <515D57A8.1090707@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 04 April 2013 01:43 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> Series contains the hwmod, clock and prm data files for OMAP54xx SOCs. >> This data was kept out of tree to be validated on es2.0 silicon version >> and also to avoid the es1.0/es2.0 differences which are many. >> >> Benoit Cousson, Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmesly and Mike have all contributed >> to get the autogen scripts in shape for OMAP5. >> >> >From various discussion on the list, the clock data files are suppose >> to be moved to drivers/clk/. Once the direction is clear, patch 8 >> can be updated accordingly. >> >> Patches are tested on OMAP5 sEVM and uEVM. For testing few additional patches >> are needed. Same tree can be fetched from here [1] >> >> The following changes since commit 7d1f9aeff1ee4a20b1aeb377dd0f579fe9647619: >> >> Linux 3.8-rc4 (2013-01-17 19:25:45 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/SantoshShilimkar/linux.git for_3.9/omap5_data_files >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 7f534e1ebeb2bc64250b56fe00eb7d4dfa585e8e: >> >> ARM: OMAP5: Enable build and frameowrk initialisations (2013-01-18 19:45:48 +0530) > > I've posted several comments on the patch contents themselves, all of > which are relatively minor, and should be easy to fix: > Indeed the fixes were easy. Have posted v2 [1] with the updates. Regards, Santosh [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg235575.html