From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: rename "i2c_recover_bus" function Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:51:56 +0530 Message-ID: <515E5F74.5050505@ti.com> References: <201304041354.30024.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, Wolfram Sang , Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 4/4/2013 7:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 4 April 2013 19:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there >> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with >> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the >> function with a davinci prefix. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> Cc: Viresh Kumar >> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org >> Cc: Wolfram Sang >> Cc: Ben Dooks > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > But i believe this stuff should be updated to use the generic recovery > infrastructure, as it is in now. > > @Sekhar: Are you looking after it? No, not in my plans ATM. Thanks, Sekhar