From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO0GL-000837-IJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 02:36:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO0GD-0006uW-6x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 02:36:37 -0400 Received: from mail.itcsnam.com ([196.1.28.178]:2301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO0GC-0006s0-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 02:36:29 -0400 Received: from [10.1.90.71] by mail.itcsnam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1UO0G8-0007DS-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: <515E70E8.1040605@itcsnam.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:36:24 +0200 From: Benito MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <515D5E9E.70002@itcsnam.com> <515D6CA7.20906@suse.de> <20130404131140.GO5000@ohm.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Raspberry ARM with 32-bit guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I've tried , no difference. Same result for puppy, centos and fedora. CPU seems to be 99% used and nothing happens. On 04/04/2013 03:17 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 April 2013 14:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> qemu-system-i386 is likely to be broken on arm hosts, I have never been >> able to boot a Linux distribution further than grub. Other architectures >> seems to work better though. > Try making the guest CPU a 486 -- we've found in the past that > something in early boot divides by zero based on RDTSC values > ending up too close together [cf some comments by David Gilbert > in https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+bug/893208] > > I don't know if this is the result of the host CPU just being > too slow or of our RDTSC emulation not being very good... > > -- PMM > >