From: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv@pseudoterminal.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Can a .bbappend introduce a different PACKAGE_ARCH ?
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 12:50:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515FFDE5.2020303@pseudoterminal.org> (raw)
Hello,
assume there is package foo, which is normally not dependent on a
specific machine. It is built with default, machine independent
configuration options.
But then I want to add a .bbappend to it, which add some configuration
options that make it machine dependent (imagine something like
--device=beagleboard).
I then add PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE_ARCH} to the .bbappend file. Is this
actually okay to do? Or does it break something?
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-06 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-06 10:50 Carlos Rafael Giani [this message]
2013-04-06 11:28 ` Can a .bbappend introduce a different PACKAGE_ARCH ? Gary Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515FFDE5.2020303@pseudoterminal.org \
--to=dv@pseudoterminal.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.