From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com>,
Cheppes <cheppes@mailinator.com>,
Luis Medinas <lmedinas@gmail.com>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: video: enhance the quirk detect logic of _BQC
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:56:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5160D237.50307@intel.com> (raw)
Currently we decide if the _BQC is using index by first setting the
level to maximum, and then check if _BQC returned maximum; if not, we
say it is using index.
This is not true for some buggy systems, where the _BQC method will
always return a constant value(e.g. 0 or 100 for the two broken system)
and thus break the current logic. So this patch tries to enhance the
quirk detect logic for _BQC: we do this by picking a test_level, it can
be the maximum level or the mininum one based on some condition. And we
don't make the assumption that if _BQC returned a value that is not what
we just set, it must be using an index. Instead, we will compare the
value returned from _BQC and if it doesn't match, see if the returned
value is an index. And if still no, clear the capability of _BQC.
Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42861
Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56011
Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Luis Medinas <lmedinas@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Cheppes <cheppes@mailinator.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
---
Thanks Cheppes <cheppes@mailinator.com> for the suggestion of choosing
different levels to test, and also for the help of in code comment
correction.
drivers/acpi/video.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index 3cdd047..306ea2a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -632,6 +632,56 @@ acpi_video_cmp_level(const void *a, const void *b)
}
/*
+ * Decides if _BQC/_BCQ for this system is usable
+ *
+ * We do this by changing the level first and then read out the current
+ * brightness level, if the value does not match, find out if it is using
+ * index. If not, clear the _BQC/_BCQ capability.
+ */
+static int acpi_video_bqc_quirk(struct acpi_video_device *device,
+ int max_level, int current_level)
+{
+ struct acpi_video_device_brightness *br = device->brightness;
+ int result;
+ unsigned long long level;
+ int test_level;
+
+ /* don't mess with existing known broken systems */
+ if (bqc_offset_aml_bug_workaround)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Some systems always report current brightness level as maximum
+ * through _BQC, we need to test another value for them.
+ */
+ test_level = current_level == max_level ? br->levels[2] : max_level;
+
+ result = acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(device, test_level);
+ if (result)
+ return result;
+
+ result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level, true);
+ if (result)
+ return result;
+
+ if (level != test_level) {
+ /* buggy _BQC found, need to find out if it uses index */
+ if (level < br->count) {
+ if (br->flags._BCL_reversed)
+ level = br->count - 3 - level;
+ if (br->levels[level + 2] == test_level)
+ br->flags._BQC_use_index = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!br->flags._BQC_use_index)
+ device->cap._BQC = device->cap._BCQ = 0;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+/*
* Arg:
* device : video output device (LCD, CRT, ..)
*
@@ -742,18 +792,15 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device)
if (result)
goto out_free_levels;
- /*
- * Set the level to maximum and check if _BQC uses indexed value
- */
- result = acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(device, max_level);
- if (result)
- goto out_free_levels;
-
- result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level, true);
+ result = acpi_video_bqc_quirk(device, max_level, level_old);
if (result)
goto out_free_levels;
-
- br->flags._BQC_use_index = (level == max_level ? 0 : 1);
+ /*
+ * cap._BQC may get cleared due to _BQC is found to be broken
+ * in acpi_video_bqc_quirk, so check again here.
+ */
+ if (!device->cap._BQC)
+ goto set_level;
if (use_bios_initial_backlight) {
level = acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(device, level_old);
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-07 1:56 Aaron Lu [this message]
2013-04-17 14:54 ` [PATCH] acpi: video: enhance the quirk detect logic of _BQC Zhang Rui
2013-04-22 12:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5160D237.50307@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=artem.savkov@gmail.com \
--cc=cheppes@mailinator.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmedinas@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.