From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ath9k: fix handling of broken descriptors
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:34:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5161F476.5090304@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=6W_C0d_wEeT8UM1+1LXOsi5xHGj=KdKF7E5BNdtLbgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013-04-08 12:24 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm!
>
> On 7 April 2013 15:04, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:
>> As the comment in ath_get_next_rx_buf indicates, if a descriptor with
>> the done bit set follows one with the done bit cleared, both descriptors
>> should be discarded, however the driver is not doing that yet.
>>
>> To fix this, use the rs->rs_more flag as an indicator that the following
>> frame should be discarded. This also helps with the split buffer case:
>> if the first part of the frame is discarded, the following parts need to
>> be discarded as well, since they contain no valid header or usable data.
>
> Have you seen this happen?
>
> I've added code to this in FreeBSD (based on the reference driver and
> ath9k doing it) and I've never, ever seen it trigger.
>
> I went digging through the EV database and I found a bug (long since
> fixed) where the code was adjusting the skb size and then pushing it
> back onto the RX queue with an incorrect size. If it allocated a 2kiB
> SKU and then reset the size to 4KiB, hilarity would ensue.
>
> This is why I'm asking. If it happens in the real world, fine. :-)
I didn't see the done bit related corruption, but I fixed the code so
that I could reuse it for the patch after it (which is based on real
world observations).
- Felix
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-07 22:04 [PATCH 1/7] ath9k_hw: clean up RF Bank6 handling on AR5416/AR91xx Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] ath9k_hw: make various ar5416/ar91xx rf banks const Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] ath9k_common: remove ath9k_cmn_padpos Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] ath9k: improve dma map failure handling Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] ath9k: fix handling of broken descriptors Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] ath9k: detect more kinds of invalid descriptors Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] ath9k: implement buffer holding handling for EDMA FIFO Felix Fietkau
2013-04-07 22:21 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-07 22:24 ` [PATCH 5/7] ath9k: fix handling of broken descriptors Adrian Chadd
2013-04-07 22:34 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5161F476.5090304@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.