From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: don't reset nf_trace in nf_reset()
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:11:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51621926.10201@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365187325-25147-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net>
On 2013/04/06 02:42, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Commit 130549fe added code to reset nf_trace in nf_reset(). This is wrong
> and unnecessary.
>
> nf_reset() is used in the following cases:
>
> - when passing packets up the the socket layer, at which point we want to
> release all netfilter references that might keep modules pinned while
> the packet is queued. nf_trace doesn't matter anymore at this point.
>
> - when encapsulating or decapsulating IPsec packets. We want to continue
> tracing these packets after IPsec processing.
>
> - when passing packets through virtual network devices. Only devices on
> that encapsulate in IPv4/v6 matter since otherwise nf_trace is not
> used anymore. Its not entirely clear whether those packets should
> be traced after that, however we've always done that.
>
> - when passing packets through virtual network devices that make the
> packet cross network namespace boundaries. This is the only cases
> where we clearly want to reset nf_trace and is also what the
> original patch intended to fix.
>
> Add a new function nf_reset_trace() and use it in dev_forward_skb() to
> fix this properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Ok, I was confused by the nf_*reset*...
This patch is more proper,Since my commit will change the behavior of TRACE in some case.
Thanks for your fix and explanation.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 18:42 [PATCH] netfilter: don't reset nf_trace in nf_reset() Patrick McHardy
2013-04-05 18:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-05 19:14 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-05 19:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-04-08 1:11 ` Gao feng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51621926.10201@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.