From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: OT: xen libvirt issue Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:46:04 -0600 Message-ID: <5162E63C.8090704@suse.com> References: <3427165.VJZ1fcVilY@localhost> <51624619.2050100@invisiblethingslab.com> <7659328.YPt9AoC338@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7659328.YPt9AoC338@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: AL13N Cc: George Dunlap , Dario Faggioli , Bamvor Jian Zhang , Marek Marczykowski , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org AL13N wrote: > Op maandag 8 april 2013 06:22:49 schreef Marek Marczykowski: > >> On 05.04.2013 13:13, George Dunlap wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Dario Faggioli >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On gio, 2013-04-04 at 21:49 +0200, AL13N wrote: >>>> >>>>> i realise this is completely off-topic, but if someone on this list has >>>>> some knowledge on this, see: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg00189.html >>>>> >>>>> the issue is that shutting down xen domains, segfaults libvirtd... which >>>>> is >>>>> annoying >>>>> >>>> I don't have any clue on this... But, perhaps, Jim does (Cc-ing him)? >>>> >>> The e-mail that AL13N linked to was actually from Jim, saying he would >>> be really busy for a while and unable to look at it. >>> >>> The question isn't off-topic, as libxl and xend have to work closely >>> with libvirt. Unfortunately, I don't think any of the active >>> developers on this list has much familiarity with libvirt. It Would >>> Be Good if someone could step up and learn, but with our feature >>> freeze next week, we're also kind of heads-down getting stuff >>> implemented... >>> >> I believe it is already fixed in unstable by this commit: >> 5f5ef65babc2ca15f43b775c4b47b0102fa2a632 "libxl: fix stale timeout event >> callback race" >> >> Sadly backport to 4.2 isn't trivial. >> > > Looking at the patch i totally agree that it isn't trivial... > I forgot to mention, that commit plus bc7e8a2a have been backported to our openSUSE Xen 4.2 packages https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=xen&project=Virtualization See 26468-libxl-race.patch and 26469-libxl-race.patch. Regards, Jim