From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> References: <1364987862-14597-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <51626D88.8020809@ti.com> <20130408170956.GX30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130408171519.GP10155@atomide.com> <5163BAA8.7040502@ti.com> <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Meerwald , Dan Williams , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Nikula List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the dela= y, pls > resend the patch and I will do the needful I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch. I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day brea= k, then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?" But I want to be sure I can add that line... -- = P=E9ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 Subject: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> References: <1364987862-14597-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <51626D88.8020809@ti.com> <20130408170956.GX30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130408171519.GP10155@atomide.com> <5163BAA8.7040502@ti.com> <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls > resend the patch and I will do the needful I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch. I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break, then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?" But I want to be sure I can add that line... -- P?ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937582Ab3DIKUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 06:20:41 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:51733 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935573Ab3DIKUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 06:20:40 -0400 Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 From: Peter Ujfalusi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130408 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vinod Koul CC: Santosh Shilimkar , Tony Lindgren , Russell King - ARM Linux , Dan Williams , Jarkko Nikula , Felipe Balbi , , , , Peter Meerwald Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels References: <1364987862-14597-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <51626D88.8020809@ti.com> <20130408170956.GX30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130408171519.GP10155@atomide.com> <5163BAA8.7040502@ti.com> <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls > resend the patch and I will do the needful I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch. I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break, then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?" But I want to be sure I can add that line... -- Péter