From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathias Nyman Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Handle ACPI events in accordance with the spec Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:17:57 +0300 Message-ID: <51652035.5000802@linux.intel.com> References: <3043137.BtEKcMiXSu@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130410075319.GN21818@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:47338 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936266Ab3DJIPx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:15:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130410075319.GN21818@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , grant.likely@secretlab.ca, ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML On 04/10/2013 10:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:57:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> +void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip) >> +{ >> + acpi_handle handle; >> + acpi_status status; >> + struct list_head *evt_pins; >> + struct acpi_gpio_evt_pin *evt_pin, *ep; >> + >> + if (!chip->dev || !chip->to_irq) >> + return; >> + >> + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->dev); >> + if (!handle) >> + return; >> + >> + status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_gpio_evt_dh, (void **)&evt_pins); >> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) >> + return; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(evt_pin, ep, evt_pins, node) { >> + devm_free_irq(chip->dev, evt_pin->irq, evt_pin); > > How about using normal request/free_irq() functions for both _EVT and > non-_EVT events? Since we now need to call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() > anyway, I don't see the point using devm_* functions here. > Then we need to create a list of non-_EVT events, or add them to the evt_pins list.