review / comments / merge protocol

[Daiane Angolini <daiane.angolini@freescale.com>]

It was not the first time that one merge was considered "too fast", and 
that other one was considered "too slow".

In fact, we do not have a protocol, so, it was not "too fast" or "too 
slow".

I know protocol may be boring. But, I believe some formalism can avoid 
misunderstood.

One week after meta-fsl-arm dylan announcement I will sent a protocol 
proposal. And I will give 2 weeks for voting and discussion. I believe 
we need at least 10 participants in the discussion for the protocol aproval.

(do we have 10 active members in the ML?)

If you disagree we need a protocol, it's time to say it. With no 
protocol, nothing can be considered "too slow" or "too fast" because 
there is no way to measure it.

If you have any protocol idea, please, let me know. I will study the 
review/merge protocol used in kernel, u-boot and yoctoproject, and adapt 
it to our "reality".  But if you have an "easier" protocol, it's time to 
say it.


Regards,
-- 
Daiane