From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches...
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:48:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5166E96E.90500@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <270954750.1682096.1365698015119.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/2013 12:33 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:30:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:25:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last
>>> two additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has
>>> been rolled back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes
>>>
>>> abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts
>>>
>>> (HIDDEN not known by most binutils 2.22 or older ones)
>>>
>>> aad17a2 ARM: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics 72c1601
>>> smdk5250, snow: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics 55e46fc
>>> da850evm, da850_am18xxevm: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
>>> 0502854 cam_enc_4xx: fix CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE semantics
>>>
>>> (PPC builds fail because --pad-to receives an expr, not a
>>> constant)
>>
>> Actually, the failure was not due to this series, but to patch
>> 16/30 of Beno?t's series. In agreement with Tom, rolling further
>> back, removing the recent TI PR merge and all of Beno?t's
>> series.
>>
>> Beno?t, can you fix 16/30 wrt PPC building? If you provide
>> branches, I or Tom can do tests.
>>
>> Once v12 is ready, I'll apply it back, then the TI PR, then the
>> __bss_end patch, then the SPL max size series, this one list in
>> order to give us time to choose how overall SPL
>> text+data+rodata+BSS size testing should be done.
>
> OK, I'll do that. I need to know: - which board fails, - where to
> find the toolchain binaries ready to use for PPC (Ubuntu
> package?), - if all other arches have been build-tested in order to
> avoid new issues popping out later.
P1021RDB-PC_NAND fails and I use ELDK 5.2 for a toolchain for PowerPC.
- --
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=2cE2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 15:25 [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 15:49 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-11 16:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 17:59 ` Tom Warren
2013-04-11 18:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 18:04 ` Tom Warren
2013-04-11 18:13 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-12 6:17 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 16:30 ` [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 16:33 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-11 16:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-04-11 17:03 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-11 16:48 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2013-04-12 8:27 ` [U-Boot] [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches PLUS 31 patches... -- FIXED Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5166E96E.90500@ti.com \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.