From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: gpio/omap v2: map irq_enable/disable to mask/unmask. Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:52:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5166F84E.9050502@ti.com> References: <20130411131842.GA9331@blumentopf> <5166DCAD.1030409@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:49064 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964931Ab3DKRwZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:52:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5166DCAD.1030409@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: Andreas Fenkart , khilman@deeprootsystems.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, daniel@zonque.org On 04/11/2013 10:54 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2013 06:48 PM, Andreas Fenkart wrote: >> Hi Santosh, >> >> I submitted the following patch a while back. >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1886421/ >> >> As already said, the patch is straight forward, but without it, >> we probably will not see decent SDIO performance on am335x chips. >> >> [why it is needed] >> > Why part is clear for me. > >> There are still open questions to gpio patch itself, see here >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg87217.html >> >> So could we pls reopen that thread? It might be on the other side >> of your mailbox >> > Your idea is reasonable and probably patch make lot of sense for > edge triggered interrupt. > > Can you please repost the patch with the more comprehensive change-log > as discussed in the thread. Originally, I had a question on enable/disable versus mask/unmask, but looking at the way we have implemented mask/unmask for omap, I don't think that my question is really applicable. Yes so please re-post. Jon