From: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>,
'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Master under test with gcc-4.8
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:50:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51675A40.6080600@intel.com> (raw)
Khem,
Just an FYI, I am firing the autobuilder tonight with Master_Under_Test
(MUT) with your latest GCC-4.8 recipe enabled, so we can get an across
the board look at what's happening.
I have seen a couple of failures with an initial build in xmodmap and
matchbox-panel (when building a sato image for x86).
Just wanted you to keep your eye on the build, I will send you any failures.
Thanks for looking after the toolchain!
Sau!
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 0:50 Saul Wold [this message]
2013-04-12 0:57 ` Master under test with gcc-4.8 Khem Raj
2013-04-12 9:18 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-12 10:02 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-12 14:20 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51675A40.6080600@intel.com \
--to=saul.wold@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.