From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: lib/utils.c bug fixes Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:58:40 +0100 Message-ID: <51684B50.9020509@googlemail.com> References: <516771D5.3040607@googlemail.com> <20130411200656.42dfb8bb@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <516810DD.80008@googlemail.com> <20130412.133644.1907806435103750855.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:52585 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752997Ab3DLR6y (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:58:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hr17so837405wib.17 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:58:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130412.133644.1907806435103750855.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > The self-rightousness with which people operating under pseudonyms or > names that do not meet the requirements of the developers certificate > of origin react when they are confronted directly about this issue I > find truly appalling. > I assume this was aimed at me, in which case I'll ask again - on what basis you or Stephen have determined that I do not comply with these terms (this is a genuine question, not a wind up - just in case you or anybody else start making assumptions!)? > It's pretty pointless to wet yourself in public over this issue rather > than just comply with our requirements if you want to submit changes > that actually get applied. > I am not "wetting myself" over anything. Again though, where (or in what part of my submission) do you think that I have not complied with these requirements? > But if you don't want to play along, that's fine, because if the issue > is important enough there's a thousand or so other developers right > behind you willing to fix or implement it too. > > We have enough developer resources that people behaving in an > anti-social manner about issues like this simply don't matter. > > I know what you're doing, you're just trying to make a point, but at > the expense of everyone else's time. That makes you a troll at best, > and an asshole at worst. > I find the above comments uncalled for at best, particularly coming from someone in your position. "troll", "asshole"?