All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Nadav Har'El <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: nVMX: Fix conditions for NMI injection
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:53:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516AD0E1.5000000@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130414152359.GT17919@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2131 bytes --]

On 2013-04-14 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>
>> The logic for checking if interrupts can be injected has to be applied
>> also on NMIs. The difference is that if NMI interception is on these
>> events are consumed and blocked by the VM exit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 56e7519..ad9b4bc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -4190,6 +4190,12 @@ static bool nested_exit_on_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  		PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool nested_exit_on_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	return get_vmcs12(vcpu)->pin_based_vm_exec_control &
>> +		PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>>  	u32 cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
>> @@ -4315,6 +4321,28 @@ static void vmx_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
>>  
>>  static int vmx_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>> +	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
>> +		struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
>> +
>> +		if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending ||
>> +		    vmcs_read32(GUEST_ACTIVITY_STATE) ==
>> +			   GUEST_ACTIVITY_WAIT_SIPI)
> The same is true for interrupt too,

Yes, but aren't we already waiting with interrupts disabled in that state?

> but I do not think that we should allow
> nested guest directly enter GUEST_ACTIVITY_WAIT_SIPI state or any other
> state except ACTIVE. They should be emulated instead.

Well, they aren't emulated yet but directly applied. So I think the
patch is correct in the current context at least.

What negative effects do you expect from entering those states with L2?

> From quick look at
> the spec it looks like external interrupts do not cause VMEXIT while
> vcpu is in GUEST_ACTIVITY_WAIT_SIPI.

Yes, see above.

Jan



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-14 10:12 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: nVMX: Make direct IRQ/NMI injection work Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: nVMX: Fix injection of PENDING_INTERRUPT and NMI_WINDOW exits to L1 Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: nVMX: Rework event injection and recovery Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: VMX: Move vmx_nmi_allowed after vmx_set_nmi_mask Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: nVMX: Fix conditions for interrupt injection Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: nVMX: Fix conditions for NMI injection Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 15:23   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 15:53     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-04-14 16:18       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 16:35         ` Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 16:43           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 19:04             ` [PATCH v5 " Jan Kiszka
2013-04-15 15:42               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-22  8:11               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: nVMX: Avoid reading VM_EXIT_INTR_ERROR_CODE needlessly on nested exits Jan Kiszka
2013-04-14 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: nVMX: Make direct IRQ/NMI injection work Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516AD0E1.5000000@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.