From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <516BA4E9.3070201@xenomai.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:57:45 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Xenomai] Raspberry and Beaglebone patches
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stephan Kappertz <stephan.kappertz@kabelmail.de>, Paul <paul_c@tuxcnc.org>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>


Hi Stephan, Paul,

we have a problem with the patches for Raspberry and BeagleBone: they
are based on the 3.2.21 patch, which we know is broken. So, we can not
really ship the next version of Xenomai with these patches.

There are two ways we could keep patches for these machines:
- you could send patches for 3.4 or 3.5, or even 3.8
- we could backport the fixes to 3.2, but as already discussed on this
list, this would cost some time to re-validate the 3.2 patch on all
architectures. However, if you do the backport, validate it on your
side, I could validate the result on my test boards, and we would
release a new version of the patch for 3.2 only for the ARM architecture.

Regards.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.