From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URhGz-0003ja-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:08:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URhGx-00068m-A5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:08:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:39968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URhGx-00068O-2k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:08:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz11so2492083pad.2 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <516BDFA8.5080807@ozlabs.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:08:24 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1365993073-4659-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <8761zofezy.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <516BA87A.2020107@ozlabs.ru> <874nf8cidj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <516BCD71.9070905@ozlabs.ru> <516BDBFB.5070602@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pixman: remove -Wredundand-decls List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , David Gibson On 04/15/2013 09:00 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 15 April 2013 11:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> I suspect I am getting these errors because I am the only person who >> is trying to cross compile or/and when host and target endianness >> differ. > > Cross compilation or otherwise should have zero effect here. When I build on native ppc64 system (***) with fc18, everything is ok. When I build on x86_64 with headers/libraries simply copied from the (***), I get these errors. gcc is 4.7.2 on ppc64 machine and 4.6.3..4.8.0 on x86_64 (cross compiler). > You may be hitting more issues because your target libc happens to be > one that not very many other people are targetting. Is standard glibc not popular any more? Wow. Neither RHEL (5.0+) nor Fedora (16, 18) has that _ASSERT_H_DECLS in assert.h. So what is the target for the QEMU people then? -- Alexey