From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URhez-00050e-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:33:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URheu-0001of-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:33:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:48640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URhSe-0003h1-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:20:36 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y10so2434016pdj.26 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <516BE27D.2060105@ozlabs.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:20:29 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1365993073-4659-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <8761zofezy.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <516BA87A.2020107@ozlabs.ru> <874nf8cidj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <516BCD71.9070905@ozlabs.ru> <516BDBFB.5070602@ozlabs.ru> <516BDFA8.5080807@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pixman: remove -Wredundand-decls List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , David Gibson On 04/15/2013 09:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 15 April 2013 12:08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 04/15/2013 09:00 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> You may be hitting more issues because your target libc happens to be >>> one that not very many other people are targetting. >> >> >> Is standard glibc not popular any more? Wow. Neither RHEL (5.0+) nor Fedora >> (16, 18) has that _ASSERT_H_DECLS in assert.h. So what is the target for >> the QEMU people then? > > Well, compilation of QEMU against glibc for ppc64 probably > doesn't get much testing. assert.h is exactly the same on my thinkpad (x86_64) with fedora18 as all (most?) standard headers. If I replace powerpc64-linux-gcc with the standard x86_64 gcc, I get the same error. -- Alexey