From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URyBR-0007iJ-IQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:11:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URyBQ-0007Z2-Gr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:11:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URyBQ-0007Yx-8o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:11:56 -0400 Message-ID: <516CDD8F.8050409@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:11:43 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130415182358.GF26210@smtp.vpn> <87li8jsjj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87li8jsjj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QTest with TCG? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 15/04/2013 21:03, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > "Edgar E. Iglesias" writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to use qtest for testing hw-models in combination with firmware. >> >> At the moment I'm using the following patch to allow qtest to run without >> accel=qtest. I'm mostly interested in the mem access functions and the >> interrupt interception. I guess time stepping wouldnt work without >> accel=qtest, but maybe that could be an acceptable limitation. Yes, but using "-icount" would provide more reproducibility perhaps. >> Is there anything in principle with such a setup that would cause >> problems? > > Interesting. No, I can't think of any problems in principle with doing > this. It was not a use case I had considered. Just one thing, how would you synchronize between the firmware and the testcase? Paolo