From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Bug: Windows 2003 fails to install on xen-unstable tip Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:56:25 +0100 Message-ID: <516D74A9.3090201@eu.citrix.com> References: <1B4B44D9196EFF41AE41FDA404FC0A10C92830@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <516D6F1D.7020007@eu.citrix.com> <20130416153720.GA12281@ocelot.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130416153720.GA12281@ocelot.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan Cc: "Ren, Yongjie" , Eddie Dong , Suravee Suthikulpanit , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/04/13 16:37, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 16:32 +0100 on 16 Apr (1366129965), George Dunlap wrote: >> This is 32-bit -- it's Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition SP2, 32-bit. I >> just tried the 64-bit install and it does the same thing. > Does it work in a single-vcpu guest? ISTR XP installs used to be less > reliable with large numbers of VCPUs (and w2k3 may be old enough to have > a separate SMP HAL). It has the same behavior in a 1-vcpu guest as a 4-vcpu guest: It boots until it says, "Staring Windows", then blocks and doesn't seem to receive interrupts. -George