From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: other rbd stuff Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:43:11 -0700 Message-ID: <516DD3FF.6020009@inktank.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:49959 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965476Ab3DPWnO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:43:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 5so532228pdd.3 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 04/16/2013 03:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > - wip-4531 looks good. should i merge it? Yes > - figured out the DiffIterate failures (rbd caching), see wip-4683. > flushing from diff_iterate should be fine right? It should use _flush() so that it doesn't count as a flush coming from an upper layer. > - the qemu-iotests are failing because of the rbd progress on stderr. > sent a patch to qemu list with a 2>/dev/null. note that qemu-iotests is > not part of qemu.git, so our test script should clone from there instead. > or we can make our own copy of the old standalone repo and host it > ourselves... Until we have a qemu gitbuilder, we should copy the old qemu-iotests repo. The tests depend heavily on the version of qemu used (output differences plus using new features and fixes for old bugs). Josh