Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Remove dependence of xfs_check script

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>]

On 4/17/13 12:17 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Replace the usage of the script xfs_check and add the relevant code to
> xfstests.
> 
> This is in preparation of the planned deprecation of xfs_check.

Other than maybe having a comment about why _xfs_check() is embedded
in common/rc for future readers, this looks fine to me, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index bf62996..dfbb5c2 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ export DF_PROG="`set_prog_path df`"
>  
>  export XFS_LOGPRINT_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_logprint`"
>  export XFS_REPAIR_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_repair`"
> -export XFS_CHECK_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_check`"
>  export XFS_DB_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_db`"
>  export XFS_GROWFS_PROG=`set_prog_path xfs_growfs`
>  export XFS_IO_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_io`"
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 09fb83f..9cea3f9 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ case "$FSTYP" in
>      xfs)
>  	 [ "$XFS_LOGPRINT_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "xfs_logprint not found"
>  	 [ "$XFS_REPAIR_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "xfs_repair not found"
> -	 [ "$XFS_CHECK_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "xfs_check not found"
>  	 [ "$XFS_DB_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "xfs_db not found"
>  	 [ "$MKFS_XFS_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs_xfs not found"
>  	 ;;
> @@ -387,6 +386,31 @@ _scratch_mkfs_xfs()
>      return $mkfs_status
>  }
>  
> +_xfs_check()
> +{
> +    OPTS=" "
> +    DBOPTS=" "
> +
> +    OPTIND=1
> +    while getopts "b:fi:l:stvV" c
> +    do
> +        case $c in
> +            s) OPTS=$OPTS"-s ";;
> +            t) OPTS=$OPTS"-t ";;
> +            v) OPTS=$OPTS"-v ";;
> +            i) OPTS=$OPTS"-i "$OPTARG" ";;
> +            b) OPTS=$OPTS"-b "$OPTARG" ";;
> +            f) DBOPTS=$DBOPTS" -f";;
> +            l) DBOPTS=$DBOPTS" -l "$OPTARG" ";;
> +            V) $XFS_DB_PROG -p xfs_check -V
> +                return $?
> +                ;;
> +        esac
> +    done
> +    ${XFS_DB_PROG}${DBOPTS} -F -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
> +    return $?
> +}
> +
>  _setup_large_ext4_fs()
>  {
>  	fs_size=$1
> @@ -589,7 +613,7 @@ _scratch_xfs_check()
>          SCRATCH_OPTIONS="-l $SCRATCH_LOGDEV"
>      [ "$LARGE_SCRATCH_DEV" = yes ] && \
>          SCRATCH_OPTIONS=$SCRATCH_OPTIONS" -t"
> -    $XFS_CHECK_PROG $SCRATCH_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> +    _xfs_check $SCRATCH_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
>  }
>  
>  _scratch_xfs_repair()
> @@ -1426,7 +1450,7 @@ _check_xfs_filesystem()
>      # option (-t) to avoid indexing the free space trees doesn't make it pass on
>      # large filesystems. Avoid it.
>      if [ "$LARGE_SCRATCH_DEV" != yes ]; then
> -	    $XFS_CHECK_PROG $extra_log_options $device 2>&1 |\
> +	    _xfs_check $extra_log_options $device 2>&1 |\
>  		 _fix_malloc >$tmp.fs_check
>      fi
>      if [ -s $tmp.fs_check ]
> diff --git a/crash/xfscrash b/crash/xfscrash
> index 7831d7e..579b724 100755
> --- a/crash/xfscrash
> +++ b/crash/xfscrash
> @@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ _check()
>      if [ $expect -eq 0 ]
>      then
>          _echo "      *** xfs_check ($LOG/check_clean.out)"   
> -        xfs_check $TEST_DEV &> $LOG/check_clean.out || fail=1
> +        _xfs_check $TEST_DEV &> $LOG/check_clean.out || fail=1
>          [ -s /tmp/xfs_check_clean.out ] && fail=1
>      else
>          _echo "      *** xfs_check ($LOG/check_dirty.out)"   
> -        xfs_check $TEST_DEV &> $LOG/check_dirty.out || fail=1
> +        _xfs_check $TEST_DEV &> $LOG/check_dirty.out || fail=1
>      fi
>      
>      if [ $fail -eq 0 -a $expect -eq 0 ]
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/085 b/tests/xfs/085
> index 27f29a3..af71b77 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/085
> +++ b/tests/xfs/085
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ _print_logstate
>  
>  # curious if FS consistent at start
>  if false; then
> -    if $XFS_CHECK_PROG $SCRATCH_DEV; then
> +    if _xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV; then
>         echo "*** checked ok ***"
>      fi
>  fi
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/291 b/tests/xfs/291
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index f842679..7723b9e
> --- a/tests/xfs/291
> +++ b/tests/xfs/291
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ done
>  _scratch_unmount
>  # Can xfs_repair and xfs_check cope with this monster?
>  _scratch_xfs_repair >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_repair failed"
> -xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed"
> +_xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed"
>  
>  # Yes they can!  Now...
>  # Can xfs_metadump cope with this monster?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs