From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57684)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1USjQ0-0004SP-Vi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:38:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1USjPz-00036Q-OU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:38:08 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:46485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1USjPz-00036L-Fi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:38:07 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c4so1094403eek.38
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <516FA2C5.4030002@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:37:41 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1366027532-1120-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1366027532-1120-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20130418053714.GE8997@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130418053714.GE8997@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master v3 1/2] kvm: reset state from the
 CPU's reset method
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de

Il 18/04/2013 07:37, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>> > +static inline void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
> You added stub to s390, but not to x86. It will compile either way with
> current enough gcc, but I wonder why the inconsistency?
> 

Because I kept it consistent within the file.  s390 prefers stubs, x86
prefers no stubs.

Paolo