From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add posted interrupt supporting Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:43:12 +0100 Message-ID: <516FB220.90809@eu.citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: Jan Beulich , Keir Fraser , "Zhang, Xiantao" , "Nakajima, Jun" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/04/13 01:19, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Keir Fraser wrote on 2013-04-18: >> On 17/04/2013 13:53, "George Dunlap" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Keir Fraser wrote: >>>> On 17/04/2013 07:50, "Yang Zhang" wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Yang Zhang >>>> The whole series: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser >>> Keir / Yang, any comments on risks to the release? >>> >>> Yang, what kinds of testing are you guys going to be doing of this >>> between now and the 4.3 release? >>> >>> From a feature / risk of slip perspective, I think this is probably >>> good. The key thing I think is making sure that if there is a bug, it >>> will be caught before the release. I suspect that a lot of people >>> won't have hardware to test this, so it will be up to Intel to make >>> sure the code has "gone through its paces" and is ready for public >>> consumption in 2 months' time. >> Personally I think it should go in, if Intel can assure they have done >> decent testing internally (and will continue to do so). > Yes, we did many testing: beside our regular testing, we also did some stress testing(boot guest and scp large file continually). And we didn't see any issue. > Also, we will put APICv testing into our nightly testing system to make sure it works well. Sounds good. So from a release perspective: Acked-by: George Dunlap