All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Richards <mrmikerich@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Swap partition vs swap file
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:57:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516d7fa80506281757188b2fda@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Is there any significant difference these days between a swap
partition and a swap file?

An exhaustive Google search turns up several conflicting answers. The
consensus seems to be that a swap partition is more efficient than a
swap file, but whether or not the difference is noteworthy is never
definitively answered.

For the sake of argument, let's assume you've got modern hardware with
ample RAM and a recent kernel (a late 2.4.x or 2.6.x), and that under
normal conditions you never seeing more than 50-100MB of swap used.

Given this situation, is there any significant performance or
stability advantage to using a swap partition instead of a swap file?

             reply	other threads:[~2005-06-29  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-29  0:57 Mike Richards [this message]
2005-06-29  5:03 ` Swap partition vs swap file Andrew Morton
2005-06-29 10:37   ` Marat Buharov
2005-06-29 11:46     ` Douglas McNaught
2005-07-07 19:50   ` Mike Richards
2005-07-07 21:59     ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-08  0:44       ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-07-08  1:22         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-07-08 15:35           ` Jeremy Nickurak
2005-07-08 21:35             ` Helge Hafting
2005-07-08 22:41             ` Wakko Warner
2005-07-09 22:59               ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-10  1:45                 ` Wakko Warner
2005-07-10  2:14                   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-07-10 12:54                     ` Wakko Warner
2005-07-10 21:40                       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-07-11 11:10                       ` Helge Hafting
2005-07-12 21:53                         ` Wakko Warner
2005-07-13 10:58                           ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516d7fa80506281757188b2fda@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mrmikerich@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.