From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.14]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0FAE01496 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail229-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.241) by VA3EHSOBE014.bigfish.com (10.7.40.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:41 +0000 Received: from mail229-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail229-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F0AD601CD; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahz8dhzz2dh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received: from mail229-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail229-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1366302275179945_19054; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.252]) by mail229-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3840062; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by VA3EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (10.7.99.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:32 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.11; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:31 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.97] ([10.29.244.97]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r3IGOTY1030702; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:24:30 -0700 Message-ID: <51701E0B.8010408@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:23:39 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabio Estevam References: <1366290728-14103-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1366290728-14103-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> In-Reply-To: X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 3/3] linux-fslc: Use KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS instead of EXTRA_OEMAKE X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/18/2013 12:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > >> # We need to pass it as param since kernel might support more then one >> # machine, with different entry points >> -EXTRA_OEMAKE += "LOADADDR=${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}" >> +KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "LOADADDR=${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}" > > Can't we put KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS into a more common location? > > In 2/3 you placed it in linux-imx.inc, which covers 2.6.35/3.0.35 > kernels, but I am was wondering if you could make this applied for all > the kernels generated by meta-fsl-arm. Maybe POKY layer. I'm not complete happy this is being handling by meta-fsl-arm -- Daiane