From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.27]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234CBE014DD for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail141-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.253) by CO9EHSOBE026.bigfish.com (10.236.130.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:22 +0000 Received: from mail141-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail141-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDE02C0255; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received: from mail141-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail141-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1366370660870838_19135; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO9EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.242]) by mail141-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26841E003F; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CO9EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.236.130.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:20 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (10.64.34.197) by 039-SN1MMR1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.11; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:19 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.97] ([10.29.244.97]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r3JBOITv002247; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:24:18 -0700 Message-ID: <5171292F.9020104@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:23:27 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1366311579-29067-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1366311579-29067-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <51704ED6.9020300@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:24:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/18/2013 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Daiane Angolini > wrote: >> On 04/18/2013 03:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> Provides a new linux-fslc.inc file which abstracts the specific >>> changes for the linux-fslc based kernels. A new variable has been add >>> to linux-imx.inc to allow to skip the 'imx-test' specific hacks after >>> kernel install as 'imx-test' is not supported for Linux mainline. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador >>> --- >> >> I understand what you did, but it's not yet a common place for both kernel >> recipes. >> >> If it is needed for *any* kernel, poky is wrong in not providing this for >> *any* kernel. > > Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some > entry point are even not in the kernel code from FSL branch. I would accept this argument if we only faced this problem with FSL kernel. But, as we faced exactly the same with kernel mainline, I can't accept that. If kernel mainline is wrong, we must fix it. Daiane