From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69499E014DD for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail137-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.253) by CO9EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.236.130.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:59 +0000 Received: from mail137-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail137-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAE33A0682; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: VS-5(zzbb2dI98dI9371Ic89bh1dbaI1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h93fhd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received: from mail137-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail137-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 136637081815828_13404; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO9EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.254]) by mail137-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013B02E0642; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CO9EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (10.236.130.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:54 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (10.64.34.197) by 039-SN1MMR1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.11; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:26:54 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.97] ([10.29.244.97]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r3JBQpRe002670; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:26:52 -0700 Message-ID: <517129C9.8040100@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:26:01 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= References: <1366311579-29067-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1366311579-29067-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <51704ED6.9020300@freescale.com> <20130419100345.5d522189@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <20130419100345.5d522189@e6520eb> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:27:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/19/2013 05:03 AM, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > Le Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:46:48 -0300, > Fabio Estevam a =C3=A9crit : > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Otavio Salvador >> wrote: >> >>> Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some >> >> I don't understand. Why 'usually'? In what sense is our case different= ? >> > maybe most defconfig support only one machine when those in > meta-fsl-arm support several machines sometimes with different LOADADDR > requirements and thus need the precision to get a working kernel on a > specific platform at compile time. I'm OK to accept the meta-fsl-arm workaround for this LOADADDR error. At=20 least until we figure out a better way to properly fix that. Otavio, what do you think about adding KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS +=3D=20 "LOADADDR=3D${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}" in mxc-base.inc and mxs-base.inc instead= ? Daiane