From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: exynos multiplatform series, part 1 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: <51714BE8.8000401@samsung.com> References: <1365716245-99231-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201304191536.17796.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:61222 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S968179Ab3DSNvj (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:51:39 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MLI003V195V8Y30@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:51:37 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <201304191536.17796.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson On 04/19/2013 03:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> These are the patches that I would like to apply directly to >> the arm-soc next/multiplatform branch, unless you have any >> objections. This would get all the simple stuff out of the >> way, and I don't think there is a big risk of introducing >> regressions with these. >> >> A lot of the other patches have already been merged into >> subsystem trees. After this series in in arm-soc, what is >> left comes down to >> >> * The ASoC conversion to dmaengine won't make it unless someone >> who knows that code better steps up to do it right away. This >> means that we won't have audio in a 3.10 multiplatform kernel >> on Exynos, but it will still work for users that don't enable >> multiplatform. >> >> * The irqchip (combiner), clk and clksource patches are all based >> on top of other changesets we pulled in from your trees, so I >> would not make them part of the next/multiplatform branch. We can >> apply them on top of the next/drivers branch once they are >> tested successfully. >> >> * A trivial patch is needed in the end to actually make >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS visible in multiplatform configurations. >> We will do that as a separate patch once everything else is >> there. >> >> Please provide an ACK so I can put this into arm-soc, or let >> me know if I screwed up somewhere. > > No reply? > > I'm putting them into the next/multiplatform branch now, with > the exception of the i2c patch that is already in the i2c > tree. > > I've tested this on the Arndale board and am putting it into > the next/multiplatform branch now as a stepping stone for > part two, which will be a late branch at best, if we decide > to merge it in 3.10. I've reviewed this patch series and nothing concerning jumps. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki if still possible. Thanks. Sylwester From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:51:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: exynos multiplatform series, part 1 In-Reply-To: <201304191536.17796.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1365716245-99231-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201304191536.17796.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <51714BE8.8000401@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/19/2013 03:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> These are the patches that I would like to apply directly to >> the arm-soc next/multiplatform branch, unless you have any >> objections. This would get all the simple stuff out of the >> way, and I don't think there is a big risk of introducing >> regressions with these. >> >> A lot of the other patches have already been merged into >> subsystem trees. After this series in in arm-soc, what is >> left comes down to >> >> * The ASoC conversion to dmaengine won't make it unless someone >> who knows that code better steps up to do it right away. This >> means that we won't have audio in a 3.10 multiplatform kernel >> on Exynos, but it will still work for users that don't enable >> multiplatform. >> >> * The irqchip (combiner), clk and clksource patches are all based >> on top of other changesets we pulled in from your trees, so I >> would not make them part of the next/multiplatform branch. We can >> apply them on top of the next/drivers branch once they are >> tested successfully. >> >> * A trivial patch is needed in the end to actually make >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS visible in multiplatform configurations. >> We will do that as a separate patch once everything else is >> there. >> >> Please provide an ACK so I can put this into arm-soc, or let >> me know if I screwed up somewhere. > > No reply? > > I'm putting them into the next/multiplatform branch now, with > the exception of the i2c patch that is already in the i2c > tree. > > I've tested this on the Arndale board and am putting it into > the next/multiplatform branch now as a stepping stone for > part two, which will be a late branch at best, if we decide > to merge it in 3.10. I've reviewed this patch series and nothing concerning jumps. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki if still possible. Thanks. Sylwester