All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:02:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5171BF0A.8010402@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171BAD6.4040003@nexus-software.ie>

On 04/19/2013 02:44 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 19/04/13 22:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
>>> which don't have CPUID.
>>
>> Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
> 
> More practical ? Hmm - the MSRs don't exist for < P5

Yes, and that is definitional.

I like doing this check before boring down in the code too far, however,
I want to make it so that it is structurally clear that this is for
Intel; other CPU vendors might theoretically have other criteria.

Architecturally, I would prefer to do this check early in
load_ucode_intel_{bsp,ap}() but I would be okay with putting it in
load_ucode_bsp()/local_ucode_ap() as well as long as the test is
conditional on the Intel vendor check.

More importantly, though: I really would like to get a fix *today*.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-19 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 17:23 [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 20:35   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 20:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-19 21:44         ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-19 22:02           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-04-19 23:13           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  9:24             ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2013-04-20 15:52               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20  0:20 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, microcode: Verify the family before dispatching microcode patching tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-20 16:21   ` Bryan O'Donoghue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5171BF0A.8010402@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.