From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A75C3ABA5 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:54:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:To:Sender:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ESEaB7iiXt5ub83XG8uACg0QoFfzzxNF7Drb+TCdwrE=; b=dYp0FXFYU+MIjGVzmCyHPk5Y3F DGa33AZ1Wcn8iRvIXHXM2JrKtb2FY1I5KojVPsFh62gqwDzzenBpKYypUHogmPRmn8SaF9kMvZMBF n7jFLS6tB7Zwt8RJilfYdcHoey2evFt4j19WPhRe+iQ5x7HL4+aqKo4ABNz1F2MA8154=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1u9oDv-00007w-CD; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:54:23 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1u9oDs-0008Nh-1c for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:54:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version :References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XDtov2T2FZ0Nm152erMm/ITMRes2ZtIRbED66S873x0=; b=IDhrB6B3kV2qsQfC+/iyMafaNC PkxgCsPI9a4k76HsqKlXEdshukMUsiuOQDlxeLE/E+BMiez0Hu0Hm9vRuH4c/KzG6nJPY+C2nC2sB SNq3Mr2mprpEJkHpe16DxQLL5I7+WaFvLgiqgoVLQteuWuUD2QgXue8WEodlSD5FCZwk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XDtov2T2FZ0Nm152erMm/ITMRes2ZtIRbED66S873x0=; b=TKneSOpPHbg3AEfQ3pNtd0JtUH RCVqKDL4a1mUp4ftTv8TNJKkZyqqa8sEB9QkUxtx/wg4PFArrBfJwYmFGY/w45N76IQb12IQ6noeG kluM1bX/aQuQDPX/gDV6iPnPxEyO0SoD8BrdtQJQdibq9yWHICLsdpCgbxvVnAwTSyMw=; Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.11]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.95) id 1u9oDa-0004Rc-Af for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:54:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Zn5xV6Q87z1CQT; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Zn5xV2KzmzBk; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nl6720.me header.i=@nl6720.me header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=Cf+BDzyo; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nl6720.me; s=soverin1; t=1745945630; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XDtov2T2FZ0Nm152erMm/ITMRes2ZtIRbED66S873x0=; b=Cf+BDzyouc7NRXoaro4rLRejwiQhzOefGLOsF/hch+lQuAzLE2ggbMluzwi5LV4d34+Y+N GaDSLKM7Fr7CQnMetLf2tIMHi1Ctmszcw33Q5gjA255Yd27v9bRUMapetBbp3k8COhJDT8 3mCKveNe66ItV2OM18cddR0klllE/FOc5gKVH9UItEOyNObzit5UdB2iuT04qAMPdDb8cw zVHAVDM6DdVpL+4kjkNkTe/xi6zUJFSIZ7PUEwB9h5AdnLYtuyxkp0ccnmsZJh97W4ugQ0 f8IMbxa89DfpWj8ahH+I6v404hjsYj3bNlDU6vmenoDYXjv7A2M4MQoWDKEFiQ== X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6811041e a=gDLi7OiDnwTL5vi9sMxOwA==:117 a=gDLi7OiDnwTL5vi9sMxOwA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=LlZiwBlNTmBLxTRSp5MA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=u4TTkWy4iRif133gqW0v:22 X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfMjE3eFah/MnJAgsTp6FlylBRzHUzc+jWV3RyMBqV66ljxAlTw5uirvmyHsxCdM4y9E+/mn4XNezqi5iXHDZVVYc4pFKo4URJbgSXqouDKjpWcLUW8E6 cTlmuxyeeGbtj0IjRekgqTKkX22HooRUTHT7tC1804WHrwx4P1dkLHRsNjNHF7KFzDd63085eLAhM12oxX1oflkzWObRCc4t3F1Ls7fi68pvI25Jp9RLEqxT To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chao Yu Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:53:49 +0300 Message-ID: <5173683.GXAFRqVoOG@nl6720.me> In-Reply-To: References: <20250425013623.918150-1-devnull@nl6720.me> <2375737.ElGaqSPkdT@nl6720.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Headers-End: 1u9oDa-0004Rc-Af Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs-tools: prefer physical over logical block size X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: nl6720 via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: nl6720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Monday, 28 April 2025 10:33:18 EEST Chao Yu wrote: > How about printing block size of f2fs as below: > > output of mkfs.f2fs: > > Info: sector size = 512 > Info: total sectors = 16777216 (8192 MB) > Info: block size = 4096 mkfs.f2fs printing it would be nice. I'm still confused by the "sector size" in mkfs.f2fs output. Is it simply the drive's logical sector size and not a fundamental part of the file system like with xfs? nl6720 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel